54
Square Enix’s president says it will be ‘aggressive in applying’ AI
(www.videogameschronicle.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
54 points (95.0% liked)
Games
16397 readers
566 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ai needs to become a part of gaming, do long as it doesn't encroach on jobs. If anything, it'll add jobs for people who specialize in ai. Games have huge limitations that can be fixed with ai, such as real time graphics and textures management, and more importantly voice work. Games are very limited in how much dialogue the NPCs repeat etc, and ai can fix this by using the already performed dialogue and stretching it, that doesn't take anyone's job, it just makes the game better.
We have to make sure people aren't losing their jobs or being taken advantage of, studios need to unionize, but I refuse to have a knew jerk reaction that limits new and useful technology. The problem with AI is in the stock holder's meetings and board room, not in the technology itself.