this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
1931 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

10447 readers
607 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
  1. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.

[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.

I don't want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is that not a type of AI already?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, there's an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,