2044
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

At what point is it too rural for that to make sense? I'm surrounded by cornfields.

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Lots of people in fuck cars communities are black and white about it. They're very unwilling to even discuss compromise. They'll say the city needs to build a subway system under all the farmland.

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

can you point me to that? because i spend a lot of time in these communities and have never actually seen that

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You tell me; your community was likely first built by having a train line drawn out to it in the frontier era, and later had the tracks scuttled due to obsolescence and overt state support for the motor vehicle alternative.

Rural rail has been done and is still done in pretty much every country that's not the USA. If you're a farmer, there's a lot of rationale to having rail built out to whatever market terminal you sell your product at. It's not unheard of for farmers to build out small private rail lines across the farm to transport goods, equipment, themselves, etc.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know a country as spread out as the U.S. that has practical rail in all rural areas. Certainly not Canada or China or India.

[-] spiphy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The U.S. The U.S. was that country. The country was built by train.

Oh, and 80% of the population lives in cities!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

And that 80% of the population should have robust public transit.

Then there's the rest of us who don't live in cities. The train never went out to farmer's fields in the hopes of picking up people here and there who happened to live between them. That's nonsense.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Canada is carbrained like the US, but China and India actually have extremely profuse rail networks.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

China and India have vast rural areas with no trains.

[-] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's fair to say absolutely 0 cars is also a problem. But we could use a bit more public transport, and less cars than what we currently have. Especially where we know many people move "in mass", like cities in rush hour.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
2044 points (93.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9373 readers
431 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS