this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1517 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aasikki@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess it makes sense that google lost here, but what doesn't seem to make sense at all, at least for me, is how on earth apple won when on their platform you literally have no other option than to use apples stuff.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I had to guess, probably for the same reason you can't sue for not being able to pick what apps you install on your toaster.

Google probably opened themselves up to this monopoly shit by trying not to be as much of a monopoly as Apple is trying to be.

I've heard a lot of lawyers say that the law punishes virtually every good behavior because that behavior can be construed in a way that you can be sued for, and that it favors being a dick more than anything. In this case, that might be what happened?

I mean, not that Google is a saint at all.

[–] Tertle950@lemmy.basedcount.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is seventeen flavors of idiotic in one sickly smartphone sundae

Law is hell on earth, and lawyers are devils.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lawyers are bad, but I'm starting to think Judges can easily be worse. You get the 'wrong' judge assigned to your case and you're done. Increasing political polarization in every aspect of life is highlighting how biased these people remain.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Isn’t a judge just an ascended/evolved lawyer?

[–] inverted_deflector@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah it still doesnt feel consistent to me. Apple is a large enough marketshare holder for a handheld computer and doesnt even give you an option to sideload another market place. The explanation doesnt make any more sense just because google is more open.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Someone else commented that the Google trial was jury decided, where the Apple trial was (assumingly) not.