11
submitted 9 months ago by guyrocket@kbin.social to c/AskKbin@kbin.social

As asked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

The part where the ecosystem is in collapse?

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Would that be stopping global warming or all the extinctions?

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ideally, global warming, but it would be fair to view that as pointless when dissipating the extra CO2 doesn't necessarily return the trees and the problem would degrade again in a couple hundred years. You'd have to introduce a new fuel source that is sought after, clean, and eternal. Which would be two wishes.

So you have to define it as both of your options, since the loss of either worsens the other. Turn the whole environment back to where it was in the 1200s, overrun the streets with bears, see if I care. It'll give 'em something to do. Especially the Amazonian avocado farmers.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

22 readers
1 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 1 year ago