573
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

I would argue that we have to be constrained by what is actually shown by the illustration and what is implied by it. It is implied that they all work together at the same time and if we're just making up things that aren't shown like an extra plane, we can make up anything.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

A planetary gear set would have illustrated the point without breaking the laws of assumption.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
573 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

6616 readers
352 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS