173
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tux@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

This article just reads as an ad for the scanning company.

Also, while it's possibly true, it's based off seriously small sample sizes.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 8 points 10 months ago

And sampling bias.

Plus they pick and choose numbers for a more drastic headline. "Sensitive" data is a very broad category, I don't know what criteria they used but that could be as little as someone's name being mentioned with a "todo" note. The quarter of a percent mentioned as having a "critical" issue I venture is closer to what most people think of when they read the title. Infosec consultants have a bad habit of inflating numbers until actual risks are lost in the noise.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
173 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59020 readers
2730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS