this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
287 points (87.5% liked)

politics

31648 readers
1844 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not."

That's gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I've heard in a while.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because in bizarro world a ban is worse than ethnic cleansing.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ban + more ethnic cleansing > no ban + less ethnic cleansing

It's utterly disingenuous to suggest the two are mutually exclusive. The ethnic cleaning only intensifies under Trump, and the ban is in addition to that. Unless we're in a bizarre world where Trump suddenly loves brown people and Palestinians.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Speculating while ignoring genocide. BlueMAGA is toxic as fuck

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gee I wonder why you guys have practically no meaningful political presence in reality. Maybe if you tell me more about how much I love genocide, I'll see the purity in your idealistic views and decide to support your cause instead.

Of course, I could fire back that you want dead Palestinian babies since you refuse to go against the most deadly option -- but that would be as utterly disingenuous as writing off all Biden supporters as genocide supporters.

[–] floppade@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

The funniest thing about this comment is that it could be easily directed at you as well.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Biden allowing their death is the most deadly option. Do you people even hear yourself? I couldn't give a fuck if you support us or not, which is preferred since liberals tend to co-opt movements and try to redirect the energy to neoliberalism.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Personally I think a Republican actively killing them would be the most deadly option. I'm curious though why you think Biden would result in more Palestinian deaths than any Republican candidate.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Are you not aware there's over 20,000 dead?