-12
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
-12 points (26.9% liked)
Starfield
2850 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]
to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm personally not a huge fan of restricted romance options. It's a game and they're literal NPCs, just let me woo whoever I want to. I could understand it maybe if there's like a literal story related context to it, but in CP2077 there definitely wasn't a reason why a male or female character couldn't have romanced the other options. And in this case I find it even weirder since gender shouldn't even matter that much anymore anyway when you can just swap out and change all of your body parts. I think in that regard the character creation & NPCs weren't even freaky enough. Hell, there were in game adverts promoting very unusual body parts for sexual purposes too and all we get is some generic transgender chargen with its original genitalia. Honestly kinda lame.