999
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MdRuckus@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OmnislashIsACloudApp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I gotta say while I'm not happy with Texas decisions and there's a lot of bs there it doesn't seem even as bad as Florida much less Alabama and Mississippi.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Texans are some of the most delusional people on the planet.

The fact they think their state even holds a candle to Florida is laughable.

People live in Texas for one reason: tax breaks.

The only other state worse than Texas is Louisiana. Everyone in the nation agrees except Texans.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Oklahoma is worse. They're basically K-mart Texas.

must have offended a Floridian?

look I'm by no means saying Texas doesn't deserve a spot on this list, but saying that Texas banning gender affirming care is somehow not as bad as government sanctioned kidnapping of trans kids in Florida is what's delusional.

[-] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Here here! You are 100% right! I hope people stop moving here in droves, it really does suck.

[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

English is not my first language, but I think it is "hear, hear". This would akin to "listen, this is true!" rather than stating where you currently are πŸ˜€

[-] stringere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

English is not my first language

And you're still better at wielding it than a Texan!

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This list seems just a little bit skewed. I'm left of center but I feel like it should've been called 10 worst states if youre, and followed it up with any number of marginalized persons. And that's fine, just want to know the metric we are talking about.

[-] Tedrick02@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

You may be forgetting the fact that 50ish percent of the population has a uterus. Even some of those without one have partners with one and value their partner having access to the Healthcare they need or may need at some point.

[-] OmnislashIsACloudApp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah I mean I would consider myself left of most of the Democratic party but you can take a look at their weightings on the metrics they used and you can see why they got the answer they did even if we'd quibble about specific state placement.

cost of doing business and business friendliness collectively makeup 20% of their weighting and cost of living and education only make up 7% total.

seems like on a list that focuses on inclusivity that they would also focus on basic needs for families but for some reason they valued basic needs for businesses at 3x families.

overall, I think in order to trust this list, I would need to lower focus on businesses and increase focus on things such as education and immigration. Texas would do poorly in both of those things but so would a lot of other states. I definitely believe it deserves a place on this list, but I don't think it would end up #1.

they're methodology summary:

  • Workforce (400 points – 16%)
  • Infrastructure (390 points – 15.6%)
  • Economy (360 points – 14.4%)
  • Life, Health & Inclusion (350 points – 14%)
  • Cost of Doing Business (290 points – 11.6%)
  • Technology & Innovation (270 points – 10.8%)
  • Business Friendliness (215 points – 8.6%)
  • Education (125 points – 5%)
  • Access to Capital (50 points – 2%)
  • Cost of Living (50 points – 2%)
[-] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Paraphrasing the waiter rule: a state that abuses any of it's residents is not a nice state. Yes, quality of life is a relative scale, but I think it's fair to put the states actively making worse the lives of it's citizens (marginalized or not) at the bottom of the list.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
999 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

β€’ Register To Vote

β€’ Citizenship Resource Center

β€’ Congressional Awards Program

β€’ Federal Government Agencies

β€’ Library of Congress Legislative Resources

β€’ The White House

β€’ U.S. House of Representatives

β€’ U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

β€’ News

β€’ World News

β€’ Business News

β€’ Political Discussion

β€’ Ask Politics

β€’ Military News

β€’ Global Politics

β€’ Moderate Politics

β€’ Progressive Politics

β€’ UK Politics

β€’ Canadian Politics

β€’ Australian Politics

β€’ New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS