1509
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 80 points 11 months ago

The biopic on this whole thing is going to be hilarious. The rumors are that the board didn’t like how fast the CEO is moving with AI and they’re afraid of consequences of possible AGI (which I don’t think these new LLMs are even close to) but that doesn’t feel like what modern boards of directors are so I don’t trust it.

It’s just baffling how this golden goose was half way strangled in the nest.

[-] MickeySwitcherooney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 11 months ago

They are a non-profit board set up precisely to exercise caution over rapid AI development.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Or this is essentially a hostile takeover by Microsoft. OpenAI is a non-profit with non-shareholders as it's board. They don't have a profit motive to develop AI quickly and without safety measures. But the tech they've developed has quickly become the hottest product on the planet.

Microsoft was clearly prepared to take on all the employees the second this happened.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

Microsoft is huge. They're always prepared to take on a few hundred new employees.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

These will come at a premium. Not only are they high-demand jobs, but they'll absolutely be sued by OpenAI if they hire away half the staff of a company with which they had a business relationship. Those legal fees alone will be 8 figures even if they win.

[-] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 4 points 11 months ago

they spent 10 figures on openai already. 8 figures for the whole openai team is pennies

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I'm positive that lawyers will get super involved and a lot will depend on the various contracts which we don't have any visibility into. But from an ethical standpoint, the openai board shat in the bathwater and can't really complain if people get out and move over to a cleaner pool.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe they are not doing it to move to cleaner water but maybe they were promised more fish if they do by certain fisherman conglomerate. But i could be wrong.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1509 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS