this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
496 points (86.8% liked)
Technology
73424 readers
4103 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Where are they getting the training data from for AI music models? I guess it's the same issue as art and language models, but wouldn't they need to only use royalty free music?
Kidz Bop and Max Martin's drunk voicemails
I genuinely do not care what the robot artist was trained on. Why would this sci-fi technology be held back by anything as stifling and corporate as copyright law?
While I would love to live in a world where people didn't need to work to make a living, right now we do. And I would rather the artists who make the music I enjoy not need to worry about someone making an AI clone of them who can pump out new albums on demand.
Too late.
Nevermind that paying those musicians for their work was already pretty optional. Most of them do okay regardless. It's almost like people care about one another and will throw money directly at creators so long as it's easy and appreciated.
Making sure people have money is infinitely more desirable and infinitely more doable than making this highly-publicized and highly-democratized technology cease to exist.