573
submitted 10 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

Our 13 month old is fully vaccinated. We do this crazy thing where we trust our doctor. He's doing great and we're doing our part...it is so frustrating how stupid Republicans are

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

The craziest part to me is the docs who believe the conspiracies. You spent all that time studying medicine and don’t believe it?

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

My "favorite" moment like this was when I was doing IT for a surgery center and one of the surgeons walked by in a "this mask does nothing" mask.

Like, how the fuck are you so pilled that your dumb ass ignores a critical part of the PPE you wear literally every day?

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Mental illness can have its pull.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Conspiracy can slander a lot of things. It used to be easy to slander anti-opiate pushing doctors "conspiracy theorists".

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Are you implying the anti-vax crowd relies on facts, data, and logic and not conspiracies?

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm implying that someone can question a "consensus" without being crazy, and can question evidence without being anti-vax. Look at Paul Offit on the more moderate end, or Vinay Prasad on the more extreme end.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

This post is about anti-vaccine rhetoric. Vaccines are safe, get over it

[-] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago

Relatively safe. They can still cause harm. That's why the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is a thing, at least in the UK.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

What I said was two very pro-vaccine vaccine researchers who were called conspiracy theorists for saying there may be some costs to mandating vaccination.

Any and every intervention has a cost, even if its just the cost of paying someone to administer and produce it.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

We had one of our cats in the vet a while back and she noted that he needed his rabies vaccine, and we could tell she was a little nervous about how we would respond. We said, "Do it!", but apparently she's had a few people respond negatively...

[-] morgan_423@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Declining your pet's rabies vaccine?

As in, your pet could contract rabies, bite or scratch you, and then you don't get the shot in time due to either denial, or you're too ignorant to see the symptoms of rabies in your pet, or they are displaying the more subtle symptoms and you don't catch it?

Even if you do catch it and treat yourself, now Fluffy has a fatal illness and has to die.

What an astoundedly stupid decision.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They are a proud tribe.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
573 points (96.3% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS