118

The question above for the most part, been reading up on it. Also want to it for learning purposes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dnzm@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago
[-] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you!!

If you don't want your devices to be accessible from the internet, you want a firewall. Treating NAT like a firewall is a bad idea.

[-] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But still, if I understand correctly, with NAT you can just use one firewall for your router and with IPv6 you'd need a firewall for each of your devices. This seems like a lot more to manage, right? But maybe I still don't understand the concept of IPv6.

Edit: Apparently I don't understand the concept of IPv6.

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's not correct, but it shouldn't preclude you from applying defence in depth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
118 points (95.4% liked)

Selfhosted

38667 readers
264 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS