758
submitted 1 year ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starlord@lemm.ee 274 points 1 year ago

Couldn't you just pay them enough so that they don't need a second job?

[-] bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world 67 points 1 year ago

Most of these people are over paid actually. Making without stock over 150k and then around the same in RSUs or more.

The issue is many folks were only doing like 3 or 4 hr a day and then double dipped to collect another paycheck because they had the time to. I don't necessarily fault them.

Friend of mine intentionally took a boring bank job making like 50k less than he was making (so around $125k a yr) so he could coast as a high performer there then planned and did find another gig in Pacific time (were east Coast) and then pulled two checks and still only worked like 42 hr a week.

This is the true reason there making work from home optional.

[-] iquanyin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

so they should just sit and stare if they’ve finished their work? don’t be absurd, please. the whole system is way past its due date. our society needs to scrap it and start over. and i mean human society. the world, our species. the one we have now if fast leading us to extinction, along with most of the other creatures on earth. what he says isn’t the way, but it’s better than harassing people for doing more work when they finish their first job.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Are they overpaid, or is every other job underpaid? Seems weird to call them overpaid when the company is making a profit on them anyway.

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

This is why we can't have nice things.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

It's management's own damn fault for trying to use butt time in seats as a proxy for productivity.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago

Huh? If the job can be done this fast and the contract says, you get this money for doing that, why should that be wrong, meaning why should anyone be unhappy?

Except companies are just in for the money and would rather pay you less ... Hmmm

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

All I can say is I agree with you; however, lots of contracts have you agree that you only work for that company while you're employed by them

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think mine has a clause too, that requires me to at least inform my employee

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

That's the point of the clause; to fire people who tell them they're working a second full-time job. When required to be in office everywhere it becomes quite obvious very quickly. They're upset they can't tell if you're two-timing or not if you work from home, so they want to make sure you come in and work for them

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Petty tactics from petty people. If someone is doing the job they are paid for, why bother? It's like the employers are entitled to the 40 hours or something, even if all the work is done.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

If someone is doing the job they are paid for,

They aren't if they aren't available because they are working the second job. I question how many people saying this are actually salaried workers who've read their employment agreements.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

and the contract says, you get this money for doing that

Almost certainly the contract doesn't say this tho.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Mine does. But I'm not working manual labor, so it definitely can and will differ I guess

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Is that a job you could get away with working 2 at the same time remotely?

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Not really, maybe this one and a half time job or sth, I work 4-8 hours a day depending on what's happening (I work in it)

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

And if you're working on something for the second job, do you have to drop it if something comes up with the first one? Does the second job know you're going to be doing that?

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Where did I say, that I have a second job? I don't, so that's that.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No idea why you're getting down votes.

load more comments (50 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
758 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
4317 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS