this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
498 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
74594 readers
4004 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What really irks the living s#it outta me is not so much that states are blindly suing social media sites just to get on the bandwagon of pretending they're doing something to help kids -- it's that nobody, not one of those people in any of those states, NO ONE - has asked kids if they feel like they're being harmed by social media. Outraged puritanical parental groups are making ridiculous assumptions right and left about what kids are seeing, and worse, assuming they know what kids are feeling as a result. They are wrong on this in almost every way. Any kid will tell you, they see worse stuff than this in other places than online almost every day of their lives. It's popular to make social media the villain - but how can you just ignore input from the very people you're pretending to be protecting.
Doing something "for the children" is more important, apparently, than doing anything useful.
It's not popular to "defend" social media these days, but plenty of studies have found that an adolescent's online life is basically a reflection of their offline life. i.e. the social media effect is being overstated due to factors largely beyond the platform's control. But if people don't want to hear that from some rando online commenter, maybe they'll listen to real scientists:
https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/news/no-evidence-linking-facebook-adoption-and-negative-well-being-oxford-study/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563223002108?via%3Dihub
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/11/16/connection-creativity-and-drama-teen-life-on-social-media-in-2022/
https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advisory-adolescent-social-media-use
https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpp.13190
Edit: The excess data collection is a separate issue, and one that really does need to be dealt with.
Great info, thank you.