this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

966 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Indiana Indiana
2. Ohio State Ohio State
3. Texas A&M Texas A&M
4. Alabama Alabama
~~5. BYU~~ BYU
6. Ole Miss Mississippi
7. Georgia Georgia
8. Texas Tech Texas Tech
~~9. Virginia~~ Virginia
T-10. Oregon Oregon
T-10. Texas Texas
~~T-12. Memphis~~ Memphis
T-12. Oklahoma Oklahoma
14. Utah Utah
T-15. Georgia Tech Georgia Tech
T-15. Vanderbilt Vanderbilt
T-15. North Texas North Texas
~~T-18. Louisville~~ Louisville
T-18. South Florida South Florida
20. Notre Dame Notre Dame
21. USC USC
22. Michigan Michigan
23. Miami Miami
T-24. Tennessee Tennessee
~~T-24. San Diego State~~ San  Diego State

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.