this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

931 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Penn State Penn State
T-2. Texas Texas
T-2. Oregon Oregon
4. LSU LSU
5. Ohio State Ohio State
6. Notre Dame Notre Dame
7. Georgia Georgia
8. Alabama Alabama
9. South Carolina South Carolina
T-10. Miami Miami
T-10. Arizona State Arizona State
12. Illinois Illinois
T-13. Florida Florida
T-13. Clemson Clemson
T-15. Kansas State Kansas State
T-15. SMU SMU
17. Texas A&M Texas A&M
T-18. Oklahoma Oklahoma
T-18. Michigan Michigan
T-20. Tennessee Tennessee
T-20. Boise State Boise State
T-20. Iowa State Iowa State
T-23. Ole Miss Mississippi
T-23. Texas Tech Texas Tech
25. Indiana Indiana

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.