-10
Is GNU Emacs still worth it? (lemmy.opensupply.space)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space to c/emacs@lemmy.ml

Seems like with all AI-enabling and just works out of the box experiences with VSCode and alike, makes GNU Emacs absolete. I'm aware of AI packages for GNU Emacs, but don't think is worth the investiement so much; I would mostly save it for org mode, TUI, and some other few packages. But for programming, it doesn't seem lile worth the investment, and use VSCode instead.


Certainly knowing things will always be valuable - but the effect of assistants and LLMs may be to change what it is valuable to know by devaluing a great heap of current generation’s programmers’s stock and trade.

As an addenda: by value in the above I mean “instrumental value” or more specifically, valuable to the rich who want to exploit the skills of others to become yet richer. There is always intrinsic value to knowing for the people who love to know.


fomosapien@emacs.ch, https://emacs.ch/users/fomosapien/statuses/111264462444461233

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lispegistus@hachyderm.io 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@nyl @Dizbdeedee If you view computing as just a bunch of commercial opportunities, yes, lisp kinda sucks, but if you view computing as a discipline for expressing thoughts in a formal, understandable and efficient manner, than Clojure, Common Lisp, Racket and even Emacs Lisp are among the top languages out there and JavaScript is near the bottom a step or two above brainfuck and perl. Haskell, Lean and Shen are also very good, and all of them owe a lot to the Lisp tradition.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
-10 points (27.3% liked)

Emacs

1978 readers
3 users here now

Our infinitely powerful editor.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS