100

"Coordinated airstrikes hit two US occupation bases in southern and northeast Syria in the morning of 19 October, in the latest escalation against US troops in West Asia since the start of the Gaza-Israel war.

According to informed sources who spoke with Al-Mayadeen, three drones were able to fly above the Al-Tanf base at the Syrian-Iraqi-Jordanian border and launch several successful airstrikes.

“The attack led to a major alert within [Al-Tanf], with continuous flights of military aircraft and helicopters in the area,” Al-Mayadeen reported.

Sources within the US-led coalition that spoke with Iraq's Shafaq News on Wednesday claimed that the occupation forces “successfully intercepted and downed two of the drones, but the third managed to target the base.”

The US occupation base at Conoco oil field in Deir Ezzor governorate was also hit by multiple rockets.

No group has taken responsibility for the attacks and no casualties have been reported.

Hours before Thursday's airstrikes on US troops, the Israeli air force attacked the Syrian army in the southwestern Quneitra governorate, causing material damage. Explosions were also reported in the Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan Heights.

US troops stationed in Iraq's Ain al-Asad airbase were also targeted by airstrikes on Wednesday, which were claimed by the Kataib Hezbollah resistance faction. Although the Pentagon initially claimed its forces repelled the attack, the official story changed to include reports of wounded soldiers as the hours went on.

“The resistance in Iraq has entered the battle of ‘Al-Aqsa Flood’ and directed its strikes at US bases,” the military spokesman for Kataib Hezbollah declared on Thursday.

Since the start of the historic Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in the Gaza envelope, factions within the Resistance Axis in West Asia have warned they are ready to join the battle against Israel in support of the Palestinian cause and that US occupation troops and bases would become “legitimate military targets” if Washington also decides to enter the fray.

As tensions escalate, the Pentagon has deployed multiple warships and thousands of troops to the Israeli coast. The UK, Germany, and the Netherlands have mobilized troops to support Israel's ethnic cleansing campaign against Palestinians."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago

the escalating resistance is simultaneously very promising and worrying, I just hope won't lead to the US or "Israel" resorting to their nuclear arsenal out of desperation

[-] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

As long as no one hits one of the two US carriers on station in the area there should be no worry about the US resorting to nukes. It's something like an aircraft carrier getting sunk that would cause the kind of psychic damage required for US leadership to have an irrational knee jerk response involving nuclear weapons.

on a side note: does anyone else hate how because the people of the US are uniquely fkd in the head and have enough nuclear weapons to leave the earth lifeless, the rest of the world has to keep in mind what kinds of events might cause the US to have a complete collective freak out? In recent years I keep thinking about how throughout all of human history hegemonic empires would rise and fall but never before has the decline of an empire come with the very real danger that as they destabilize it could result in them killing everyone on earth rather than just themselves and their neighbors. It feels like being locked in a room with another individual who is experiencing deteriorating mental health and is in possession of a hand grenade no one can take away from them without risking setting it off.

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

China's masterful trick of trapping the West into economic codependency will only be eclipsed by China's judicious management of US decline in order to prevent nuclear holocaust.

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The world will never be free of the threat of US initiated nuclear war until the rest of the world all has hypersonic nukes pointed at every inch of the US to the magnitude they could wipe out every missile we have. The US will never relinquish their arsenal so long as there is a chance they can still use them effectively. Only until the US is de-nuclearized can the world breath a sigh of relief. I goo I could see that in my lifetime but I doubt it.

[-] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Only other way I could think of is somehow sneaking ICBM interceptor missiles into the US and Europe (and I*ael?) because the launch phase is by far the most viable time to intercept, and then hope you can take out all the missiles fired from subs during the midcourse and keep their bombers from getting in range. That would require such an intelligence failure from the US however, so that’s just fantasy anyways.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

even then there are submarines that can launch icbms with multiple independently targeted warheads per missile

[-] proletarian_girlboss@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago

I tend to not really worry about the US deployment of nuclear weapons at our current stage. If they use them, in a way they lose their leveraging power. Which is why they have been threatened to be used in so many of the wars the US has created, but only deployed twice, when it was only the US who had access to them. I remember one article I read recently that pointed this out in the context of the invasion of Korea. Despite both Korea and China not having nuclear weapons, and the US feeling a strong desire to use them, it never happened, and the US lost anyway. There were strong considerations for using nuclear weapons in the invasion of Vietnam as well, with the same result. It is what Mao referred to when he described the imperialists as paper tigers. When actually pushed, their cowardice is shown. Isn'treal is demonstrating this now I think, given how immensely incompetent its response to the resistance has been, and the fact that it keeps hesitating to send a ground invasion. It is not in their interest to do all the things they threaten to do, I think. At least not yet? It could change if it was undeniable, even to the most deeply unhinged supporters of the settler colony that their own defeat is inevitable. Which, while it seems to us that it may be, to the settlers. there is still this notion that they have the right to what they have stolen, that it is god's gift to them, etc. They cannot imagine a world without isn'treal just as the colonial occupiers of the various African colonies thought their reign was permanent. So their state of panic, I think, is not yet to the point of something as drastic as a nuclear attack.

[-] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I hope you're right 🫡

[-] DeDollarization@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Mohammed Al-Deif told the world from the start of Al Aqsa Flood: it is Jihad until victory or martyrdom 🫡

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
100 points (99.0% liked)

GenZedong

4251 readers
6 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS