314
submitted 1 year ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Are there any non-extremist anti-car communities around? I hate cars too, but I also hate simple, blanket solutions like the world is easy or something.

For some people, not driving is just death from starvation. So, no. Thanks though.

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I don't see anything extremist in this community. It's mostly complaining about problems with cars and a few memes like this post. Talking about alternatives is fine here, as per the rules. There isn't much as far as other communities to discuss alternatives, at least not that I've found. Here's what I can point to:

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ooh, thank you. I was just complaining about an annoying meme on the internet in a comments section, don't mind me.

Unfortunately I think we're defederated from beehaw still, lol, but the transit one is new for me. Appreciated.

[-] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

For some people, not driving is just death from starvation

That seems like the exact kind of thing many people are against. All of this was by design in order to create a dependence on cars. This is not how it has to be. There are a lot of alternatives that are worth investing in.

I don't believe anyone would suggest to immediate destroy all cars right this second without putting in any kind of necessarily alternative infrastructure. That would be a pretty extreme stance on the matter.

I would like to see the US government stop subsidizing cars and start subsidizing alternatives such as trains so that maybe in 30-50 years we can start to see that it is possible to live without driving a car.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ironic thing is that there really is a "simple, blanket solution" in this case: changing the zoning code to stop outlawing density.

It's not a fast solution -- the law can be changed at the stroke of a pen, but the redevelopment enabled by the rule change will occur over years and years -- but it's the only one that actually solves the problem.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Blanket, yes. Simple, no. Not unless you think politics is simple.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's fair.

[-] citruslumps@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

People are so bad a naming causes.

This toxic ass community is the same as BLM and anti work. Both have good intentions but alienate most people with their terrible names.

At least anti work had a better named workreform equivalent. But BLM shoulda be accountability for killer cops or something. I bad at naming shit too but hopefully you get my point.

Fuck cars is about infrastructure and mostly just cities. But it's so terriblely named it will never catch on.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Fuck cars is mostly a meme community spreading ideas from the larger urbanist movement, which has the benefit of having a less hostile-sounding name.

The meme community inarguably manages to recruit new people into the urbanist movement, and I haven't seen strong evidence that it's alienating more people than it is recruiting, fwiw.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Ya its called major big cities, mainly on east coast since anything built out ww2 sucks.

The catch is you will need to be rather "affluent" to enjoy the good life in this here country.

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

In what country? This is the internet.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
314 points (87.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9784 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS