this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
370 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31815 readers
3009 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House and Department of Justice have reportedly been discussing potentially throwing journalists in jail to reveal the identities of leakers and fresh White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is behind the plan.

In an Atlantic report about the exit of Susie Wiles from her chief of staff role at the White House, it was revealed that a plan to jail journalists is in consideration in the administration. Wiles reportedly pushed back on such a plan while Miller gave it his endorsement.

According to the report, which cites multiple people familiar with the situation, Donald Trump has been pressing the DOJ to pursue criminal cases against people who leak information to the media on “national security grounds.” Various “tactics” have been discussed, including arresting journalists to push them into revealing their sources.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

A coworker said Stephen Miller can’t be a Nazi because he is Jewish…

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, I've heard that one. The answer is that PeeWee Himmler ISN'T a Nazi. None of them are. The Nazis were from the mid-20th century. In the mid-19th century, they were called Confederates. In the 21st century, they're called MAGA. It's not that these people are Nazis, it's just that all those groups draw from that same slice of society's underbelly that exists at any given time.

These people have always existed, and after we've crushed and purged MAGA from our government and our society, they'll still be there. A healthy society recognizes this, and slaps those dipshits down as soon as they get froggy. Occasionally, a country weakens, and these people are always waiting like coiled springs, ready to spring into treasonous action. Capitalism weakened us into allowing the rise of MAGA, and once they're gone, we have to be more vigilant in the future.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have they never seen Schindlers list? In the first 10 mins you find out jews were complicit in their own demise. The character says "its not so bad and the pay is great".

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep I’ve told him that too and he just says it’s completely made up. Yet he is Mexican and fully supports ice and what they are doing to the Mexican community.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

He's a special kind of stupid.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe he can explain the Haavara Agreement to you then.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which, in my opinion, is the same thing as any Hispanic person working for ICE. Bet it’s the same mentality.

i'M oNe Of ThE gOoD oNeS

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

No amount of facts can change these idiots minds.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will definitely send this to him but I doubt he will read it.

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Print out the good bits in size 20-30 font and place on his desk

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your coworker should look into what Miller's own family has to say about him.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That’s what I told him and he says it’s all a psyop I’m falling for.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Copium is a powerful drug.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

It's funny how gullible people of all stripes often have the same ultimate fallback when faced with information that challenges their worldview: it's due to a government psyop/troll farm/et cetera.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah right. That would have been my cue to stop speaking with this person beyond the bare minimum needed to do my job.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

After laughing in their face, of course.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yea pretty much what I did.