1510
graceful degradation: the opposite of planned obsolescence (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/technology@slrpnk.net
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago

Not this particular example, maybe, but the concept of a device remaining usable in failure runs counter to planned obsolescence.

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily, Apple for example makes interacting outside its ecosystem difficult on purpose for “calculated misery” iirc. It’s like when your boss cuts most of your hours instead of firing you. You don’t get optimal output or the benefit of transparency.

[-] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see what you mean. I suppose the difference is the intent and the effect on the customer.

  • Obsolescence: the device is poorly maintained, or designed to make using it past the desired (for shareholders) support date miserable.
  • Grace: the product is designed to keep functioning past the point where normally it would cease to be of use to the customer.
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1510 points (97.8% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2348 readers
2 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
KeraKali@slrpnk.net
bot@slrpnk.net