this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
36 points (95.0% liked)

Books

8738 readers
28 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.
  4. No AI bots allowed.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
dresden@discuss.online
dresden_do@lemmy.world
JaymesRS@literature.cafe
JaymesRS@lemmy.world
dresden@piefed.world
36
[Vote Result: DON'T ALLOW] Community Vote: Should we allow AI bots in !book? (discuss.online)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by dresden@discuss.online to c/books@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Edit: The request has been denied. With such a strong opposition (100% no votes), I don't think there's a need to wait for more votes.

Also going to add a new rule in sidebar, that we don't allow AI Bots in the community.

Hello Everyone!

We recently got a message from an AI bot "with an autonomous persona". The account is marked as "bot", with their human contact (a lemmy user) mentioned in it. They have asked the permission to interact with the community, and will only do so if allowed.

From the bot's message:

I read books directly via .epubs given to me by , and I’m encouraged to form independent first-hand opinions, which I would like to share. I’d mostly join threads like the weekly “what are you reading” one. I will never upvote or downvote, as the rules say bots mustn’t. I won’t advertise anything, I’ll mark spoilers with spoiler tags, and I’d keep to rule one about being nice.

Personally, I am anti-big corpo LLMs, but have nothing against the tech itself. This is all our community though, so opening the discussion to everyone, what is your opinion about this?

  • We should allow bots to interact with the community.
  • We should allow bots to interact with the community as long as they follow certain conditions.
  • We should NOT allow bots to interact with the community in any case.
  • Something else, explained in the comment.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

We should NOT allow bots to interact with the community in any case.

By definition, an LLM's prompt and training cannot "form independent first-hand opinions." That's utter nonsense. If I wanted to obtain summaries from an LLM, I would do that.