this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
282 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12625 readers
475 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One-in-three Canadians is tapping into savings or borrowing to buy food. Those are the latest findings in the Canadian Food Sentiment Index report by Dalhousie University's Agri-Food Analytics Lab. Of those surveyed, food affordability remains the top concern, but transportation is adding to household financial strain. However, when it comes to eating out at restaurants or take-out, the numbers tell a different story with Millennials leading the way with spending the most money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4TBHMeCCL@suppo.fi 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Sounds like it's time (if you can afford to) to donate to a food bank. I've read that donating to one like Canada Food Bank (or your provincial one) has a greater impact than your local food bank.

There are many ways this could be solved, but the governments seem to always refuse to do so. Like UBI, or forcing groceries to not pass on the increased costs to consumers.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 16 points 2 days ago

On this topic, donating food is of course awesome, but if you can, donate money. The food bank can stretch that $5 muuuuuch farther than you can in terms of food.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know the saying:

‘Donate to a food bank and feed a person for a day but teach them to shoplift and you feed them for the rest of their lives.’

[–] RadiallyAxiomatic@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I honestly wouldn't be able to tell you what a shoplifter looks like.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Potential mechanisms include capping profits of select food supply chain industries to a specific amount. E.g. a progressive tax that reaches 100% above a certain amount. This eliminates the benefits of gouging.

Another potential mechanism is heavy regulation or even nationalization of critical food industries. For example, otherwise healthy food that doesn't meet commercial standards for size, colour etc, can be sold to the government for a minimum viable price, but sent to food banks and soup kictchens. As a consumer paying top dollar you'll want the best looking potato carrot or apple, but for a soup kicthen's free meal, any potato will do. Consider it a buyer of last resort. It doesn't mess with the markets, but it underpins total availability. Yet another is to let food bank volunteers scrape nearly but not yet spoiled food as a means of stocking up. Instead of buying food, food bank dollars can focus on logistics of eliminating our tremendous spoiled food that didn't sell. It currently just goes to waste. The stores benefit because volunteers help trim shelves of food that is almost past due, and food banks and soup kitchens get food for free or at least the cost of getting it and preparing it.

There is also progress being made with apps like TooGoodToGo where food businesses can offer deep discounts on random stuff before things go bad. The programs can be expanded and optimized for greater food equity.

There are lots of opportunities. This is a failure of markets, because there is still, in absolute terms enough food for everyone. Markets only chase profit, so ideally this needs to be a public solution.

No one in this country needs to go hungry.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One major issue is that the big grocers also own a good chunk of their supply chains.

So farmers get paid jack shit, the consumers pay through the roof and the grocers can claim that they need to raise the prices because of the supply, which they own while pocketing ever more money.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Hedge funds and private equity too, why I suggested a cap on profits.

[–] quanin@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends how much you're donating. Your $20 will go farther municipally than provincially.

Re: price controls, that's been tried before (not in Canada). It didn't end well. What makes you think they wouldn't end the same? Specifically, how would you prevent the price-restricted companies from deciding to just... not sell the things that are least profitable under that model?

[–] RadiallyAxiomatic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the loophole of “well, now I coincidentally don’t wanna sell that anymore!”/“I just can’t find a supplier!” Only work if you give them the benefit of the doubt. If they’re getting fined $10k/day/location for as long as they don’t sell the things people need to buy, I bet they can find a supplier. If not, maybe it’s time to deprivatize some grocery store businesses.

[–] quanin@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What they'll do is find the one thing that isn't price controlled and wham, up it goes. Loblaws doesn't just sell food, after all. Neither does Walmart. Neither does Metro. And if you decide that if it's sold in a grocery store it's now under a price control, well, maybe some locations no longer have grocery stores. On the bright side that opens the door for Avi Lewis's public grocery store idea. On the not-so-bright side, if Avi's public grocery store doesn't sell what you're looking for because the government doesn't think you should have it, you're pooched.

[–] potatomuncher@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Property contro issue is also a factor that needs to be tackled.

[–] quanin@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Why not both? Though if I'm honest no government be it right, left or centre will do much of anything about either, and their solutions will almost certainly create more problems.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

We also need to nip surveillance pricing in the butt asap

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Also, donate to things like the Salvation Army emergency food fund. Why? Because if you lose your job tomorrow and have debt but minimal savings, guess what? You can’t just walk into a food bank and walk out with dinner. You walk in, fill out the paperwork, and then wait until it is processed and the next distribution day arrives.

So if you need food TODAY, call 211. They’ll find your local emergency food service, who likely is funded almost completely by donations, unlike food banks that have some government support (through the CFB).

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the reminder. I'm far from rich but I'm more fortunate than some and my company has donation matching -- so I'm going to do it first thing tomorrow.