this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
638 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
89245 readers
4644 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How about don't use AI to begin with so you won't have to weed anyone out due to "potential slop".
Edit: this is in response to the parent comment, not to Proton...
If you haven't used it professionally, LLMs can and do provide huge help. Making this a specially all or nothing argument only highlights a knowledge and experience gap on the part of someone making that argument.
Buuuuut, only an idiot asks for anything better than a starting point or a check of existing work. People relying on it to produce whole cloth work is for hobbyists and sloppers that don't care or know any better.
You ask why they need to use LLMs at all, and they host their own, Lumo. What clear, financially solid argument can you make that LLMs are an objective net negative to every company? If they see benefits from a headstart on coding and ability to test their security, why demand they take that away when no human code is 100% perfect anyway?
I haven't used it professionally, but I still know they provide huge help. It's no secret. But my statement was simply following the logic of the previous commenter, who was saying that Proton are trying to weed out the people who aren't able to QC out the slop. But if you are in need of QC to remove the slop, you are probably overdosing on agentic coding to begin with.
Anyway, "only an idiot asks for anything better than a starting point", sure, definitely agree. But what percentage of being a professional developer at a company involves prototyping something new, and doing "starting points"? Most development is just tacking on new shit to old shit. Clamping shit together with other shit. I guess that's the issue?, which causes people to still use AI because they are pretty much forced to, sometimes literally, and so actually do ask for more than just a starting point. And then here we are...
I fear you may misunderstand their goal here- direct quote:
They specifically want to "weed out" the ones who ARE NOT using AI
Welp, even worse. Fuck em.
NOW we agree. Fuck em hard.