Firefox

18049 readers

103 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

1057

Firefox now has speed parity with Chrome on the Speedometer benchmark (mozilla.social)

submitted 1 year ago by garam@lemmy.my.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1376783

Thought I'd never see the day when Firefox would match Chrome on Speedometer.

There's also a few other benchmarks got a sizable boost. https://arewefastyet.com/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 156 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Speed almost doesn't matter for me, since Chrome allows ads and Firefox actually lets me use adblockers and privacy badger. The time wasted on ads are way larger than the time spent loading a page.

[–] FinallyDebunked@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

never thought about it, but I tend to concur

[–] ancientweasel@social.fossware.space 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah. A pihole sped up the internet for me big time.

[–] noel_105@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a Firefox user, but doesn't Chrome allow adblockers too? Both uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger are supported extensions on Chrome.

[–] henfredemars 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They do, but Chrome is actively trying to remove support for most advanced ad-blocking capabilities. Further, Google has no financial incentive to make their browser hospitable to ad blockers as Google makes most of their money from advertising.

Google has pushed some half-baked ideas for how the web could work without having to block ads. Ad blocks aren't best buddies with Google.

[–] noel_105@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the response and info. Another day where I'm glad to be a FF user.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Correct, but Chrome recently allowed ads through that weren't block-able by uBlock Origin or any other blocker at the time. That's when I switched back to Firefox, so I don't know if anyone figured out a way around it.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What do you mean? Adblockers for Chrome exists.

[–] blackbarn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Also note differences of these capabilities on their respective mobile apps.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They do, but Google reduced their utility. Ads from YouTube get through my uBlock Origin, and I see ads in my search results. This was a fairly recent development, as maybe a year ago I didn't see any ads at all on Chrome. The day I got ads punched through my blockers, is the day I quit being lazy and migrated back to Firefox.

Google has no incentive to block ads when that's part of their revenue stream, so they nerfed third party extension's ability to actually work at intended.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Sure it does...