this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
310 points (78.9% liked)

Autism

6555 readers
333 users here now

A community for respectful discussion and memes related to autism acceptance. All neurotypes are welcome.

We have created our own instance! Visit Autism Place the following community for more info.

Community:

Values

  • Acceptance
  • Openness
  • Understanding
  • Equality
  • Reciprocity
  • Mutuality
  • Love

Rules

  1. No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
  2. Posts must be related to autism, off-topic discussions happen in the matrix chat.
  3. Your posts must include a text body. It doesn't have to be long, it just needs to be descriptive.
  4. Do not request donations.
  5. Be respectful in discussions.
  6. Do not post misinformation.
  7. Mark NSFW content accordingly.
  8. Do not promote Autism Speaks.
  9. General Lemmy World rules.

Encouraged

  1. Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
  2. Funny memes.
  3. Respectful venting.
  4. Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
  5. Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
  6. Questions regarding autism.
  7. Questions on confusing situations.
  8. Seeking and sharing support.
  9. Engagement in our community's values.
  10. Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
  11. Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it. Chat Room
  • We have a chat room! Want to engage in dialogue? Come join us at the community's Matrix Chat.

.

Helpful Resources

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Taking a quick look at the comments I see we're back to 2000s autism speaks bullshit.

Autistic people aren't suffering unless you're putting them in a system that treats them as subhuman.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Autistic people aren't suffering unless you're putting them in a system that treats them as subhuman.

Ah, I see you're familiar with society as well.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, let's face it, I've seen one meme where autism is described as a condition where everyone else around them has a disorder where they say things they don't mean, where they don't care about structure, fail to focus strictly on singular topics, have unreliable memories, drop weird hints and stare creepily into eyeballs. And the people with autism are the ones with the disorder, because there are way more of the others.

[–] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well well well, just look at any job and watch how people are treated.

[–] Sarsoar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes most autistic people shouldn't suffer if we dismantle the oppressive societal constructs and stigma around the condition and treat them as human.

Most people shouldn't suffer if we break down the social constructs and stigma around them, from race, gender and sex, class, and many other factors.

Antinatalism is not about selectively culling autistic people. It is about the realization that society sucks and the societal constructs we have are likely to increase suffering and so we shouldn't have kids anymore until those issues are resolved.

I am gay, and a racial minority, and an antinatalist. I would hate to have a child knowing they would likely have to face racial discrimination just as much as I do not find it moral to have a child because they may be gay, or autistic, or gender nonconforming, or poor. All those things would likely increase their suffering.

But I wouldn't mind adopting any of those kids, even an autistic child, because live people are people and deserve love and compassion. Antinatalism is about the non-alive children that don't exist and the stance that they shouldn’t ever come to be, no matter what they end up being because in our current world, live likely won't be easy, they would likely contribute to the global environment crisis, and will likely increase the suffering in the world. And also they cannot consent to being forced into existence.

[–] Globeparasite@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I would hate to have a child knowing they would likely have to face racial discrimination

Yep easier to die than dealing with the problem and, you know trying to do something. You know thank god everyone before us choose that instead of striving for social progress, that's precisely why society has been steadily progressing towards amelioration for at the VERY least the past 500 years.

I do not find it moral to have a child because they may be gay, or autistic, or gender nonconforming, or poor

So... that, my friend, is turbo-eugenics. Yes, because you finding it immoral to have kids because they could be those things means that, if you had a mean to have kids, without those risks it would at least be less immoral. Oh and before you start to find excuse : making every argument for something and just saying at the end that it is bad is not being against something.

[–] torpak@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Autistic people aren’t suffering unless you’re putting them in a system that treats them as subhuman.

While that is true for many of us, it's not true for all of us. But I'm still sure most of us still like being alive, so i'm not disagreeing with the sentiment behind your argument.