this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
400 points (100.0% liked)
HistoryPhotos
1784 readers
67 users here now
HistoryPhotos is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
- Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.
Related Communities:
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !askhistorians@piefed.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Contraception exists, so you can keep banging without children. Maybe they decided they didn't want more children.
Unless there's some "staunchly against jimmy caps" lore about the Addams I am unaware of.
Contraception usually is advertised with like 99% to 99.9% success rate. So still a bit of a plot hole.
Success rate isn't per time, it's per couple per year. So something with a 99.9% success rate being used by 1000 opposite sex couples will have one of those couples expecting by this time next year. This also assumes that they're having sex pretty regularly in a way where the contraceptive would be relevant. The odds of it working per session are much higher than the stated 99.9%.
I think you're taking this a bit seriously. But condoms do split, and I'm sure there can be failures in other methods. It was just a bit of a joke
They're into butt stuff. Both of them.
That works.