this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
247 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

89245 readers
4492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The intitial investigation is in.

In a “bizarre and unprecedented” cyber-attack, hackers had remotely overridden the temperature settings on thousands of freezers, fridges and chiller cabinets pushing them from as low as -27C (-16.6F) to well over 50C (122F).

If shop managers first assumed it was an isolated failure, it soon became clear up to 700 stores – including those from the Intermarché, Coopérative U, Carrefour, Leclerc and Monoprix chains along with a number of smaller independent shops – had been victims of a cyber-attack.

The hackers had pirated the controllers supplied by the Danish company Danfoss that controls the freezers and fridges. Most supermarket cold aisles are connected to the internet to allow remote maintenance and alerts for system failures. Initial investigations suggest the hackers disabled alarm systems before tampering with the thermostats, or extended the defrost programme by several hours to avoid triggering alarms.

Danfoss said it had identified security flaws last year and had “long recommended” that customers install updates or replace obsolete unsupported systems. The affected refrigeration units were “running outdated firmware”, it said. In the days following the first wave of attacks, France’s cyber-attack alert centre ANSSI confirmed supermarkets using controllers from two other companies were also targeted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 105 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Hacked? This term applied to this is an insult. The user name was "admin", and the password changed daily - it was the current date.

This is not hacking, this is a complete and utter failure on behalf of the company who set this up, and their fault entirely.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Password changed daily

Wow, that's crazy security practice!

it was the current date

Oh.....

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

// TODO: Change this to a time based crypto key deriving algo before release

char *passwd = curr_date

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Somewhere in France an extremely frightened thirteen year old hasn't touch anything electronic in a week.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you have a source on this? The other article I had seen on this said the password changed daily and was algorithmically based on the date. So if someone analyzed past passwords they could derive future passwords, but not that it was literally the date.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/117429502412235079

https://ironhackers.es/en/danfoss-ak-sm-800a-cve-2025-41450/

The “code of the day”

Many industrial devices include a service access so the vendor’s technician can get in without the customer’s password. A classic —and dangerous— way to implement it is the code of the day: a code that changes every day according to a formula that, in theory, only the vendor knows.

The problem shows up when that “secret formula” is the only thing protecting access (security by obscurity) and it can also be recovered from the firmware itself. That is exactly what happens here: sm_app ships unobfuscated, with function and variable names in plain sight. The one that validates the code is called, literally, check_code_of_day.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

~~Security~~ through obscurity.

'date+123' would be an algorithm based on the date. Given non techie users, it was probably something like that.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's not even social engineering.

I keep trying to tell the school administration the same thing each time my special needs kid wanders into some gapping security hole and they call it hacking.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Guessing the password based on a recognised pattern is absolutely hacking. There's not really a difficulty minimum to the term hacking