116
Messaging service Signal says minister’s changes to lawful access bill will not persuade it to stay in Canada
(www.theglobeandmail.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
🌐 Other Relevant Communities
Rules
Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Of all the thing the people are worried about and would want legislation to get more protection from, criminals communicating in secret is pretty damn low on the priority list. Especially when their "solution" for it is so damn invasive to everyone.
How about they do something about the increasingly invasive data collection everyone is being subject to by big tech whether they want to or not? You can't even buy a car anymore that doesn't come with a built-in location tracker.
I would rather get legal protection from criminals attacking me.
For example, scammers, spammers, and malware spreaders who want to steal my identity and/or money.
Legislating new vulnerabilities into my devices make those worse!
Edit: immagine a world where instead of weakening security, legislators were working to stop this: https://haveibeenpwned.com/PwnedWebsites
If a public service isn't safe for criminals to communicate anymore, they'll just use something else. Plain and simple.
And so all the legislators end up doing, effectively, is to trample on everyone else's privacy.