this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
865 points (97.9% liked)
Work Reform
17767 readers
1496 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This entire post and thread is about how therapists won't mention capitalism and the housing crisis and instead say that it's something like depression or a personality disorder that causes someone to feel bad or suicidal. Do you think this claim is true or not? What I am saying directly contradicts that.
We have pretty different perceptions of this entire post and thread then. I read the text in the image specifically as a medical professional lamenting that their position pushes them to diagnose a disorder in the individual rather than validate their difficult and unpleasant perceptions of the systems they're operating in. Acknowledging someone's experience is well within the scope of therapy, but at the end of the day they can only facilitate change in the individual not the society. It will never say in the patient notes "this guy seems fine, society's what's fucked up!" because... That's in no way therapeutic and has nothing to do with a therapists job. I still don't really see the contradiction, but this is starting to feel more like goal-oriented litigation than a nuanced discussion so I'm going to wish you well and move on. Have a nice day, fellow poster :)
I honestly can't tell if you're trying to be non-confrontational, but nothing about this entire interaction seemed kind of you. If you really have the intent to be nice to people online, and you really want them to be well, I advise you to reconsider how you act.
First you tell me I'm wrong about therapists, that the truth is "honestly not particularly complex", act condescending by saying "obviously" this and that. And then when I try to be nuanced about what we're talking about, you ironically complain that this isn't a "nuanced discussion", then cut the discussion short.....
So I don't really appreciate you making me out to be the confrontational one, when you basically came in here, implied I'm a simpleton, and left as soon as I tried to explain myself.
I'm very sorry to have made you feel like a simpleton, and could not be more genuine in my hope you have a nice day. Think the hyperbolic conflation of questioning a therapists role in society with seeing them as part of an illuminati conspiracy set a difficult tone. I'm also getting kinda blown up in another thread right now. If there's something else you'd like to say, by all means feel free
No no you're good. I appreciate the kindness. I also try to be kind to those who are kind, which is why I bothered to be persnickety about tone in the first place, because it did seem like you had good intentions.
Man, I don't know... "I'm sorry that I made you feel like a simpleton" sounds patronizing as fuck, and I'm not sure they deserve the benefit of the doubt that you've given them. I'm not sure they were actually trying to be kind.
Yeah, I wasn't going to get precise about it, but technically they didn't make me feel like a simpleton, just made me feel like they thought I was a simpleton, lmao. But its all good.