this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
37 points (95.1% liked)

Canada

12508 readers
553 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am of the belief that any back to work legislation should come with a major penalty to the employer. For a private company this could be in the form of a huge fine, but if it's a public body it should come with the firing of the executives. If a group of workers is too essential for them to have the right to strike, then allowing negotiations to break down shows gross incompetence on the part of the negotiation team.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I agree, but I don't know how you can make the fine scale appropriately for different organizations. Maybe the government and union should get an ownership stake.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That's why firing the executives would be so much more effective, I just don't know how that could work with the government forcing a company to fire someone. That being said, I also don't know how they should be able to force workers to work, so maybe that could be some sort of condition.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

firing the executives would be so much more effective, I just don't know how that could work with the government forcing a company to fire someone.

Especially someone in another country working for a foreign owned company.

Ideally the contract should not have been renewed and another (Canadian and not a for-profit company) service provider hired.