this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
1377 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

17914 readers
161 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sounds like here it's letting a private company spend the money to get access to 3,000 residences in exchange for 1,000 affordable ones.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

The phrase "at no cost to the city" is a red flag.

It either means someone is lying, or that there's some kind of "public-private partnership" which are frequently handouts to corporations or rich people.

Maybe this is the rare case when the government will properly supervise the private side, and hold them to account.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And as usual I don't know if I should be outraged that a private company is involve that may lead to questionable practices or happy that at least they are 1000 affordable units available. Both maybe? I guess I'm cautiously optimistic.