this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
846 points (85.5% liked)

Political Memes

12626 readers
1452 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] CardboardDecoy@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm choosing to believe they were being sarcastic but yeah. Don't forget that the tankies would rather have everyone die than not have every one of their demands met under their terms.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Literally. Tankies would gladly sacrifice every trans person if they thought it would usher in their nonsense global revolution.

[–] CardboardDecoy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah and I would wager that tankies are actually even doing it intentionally some decent percentage of the time because it's a movement based in ego and supremacy, and that usually follows that they tend to have a lot of sacrificable out groups...

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not really.

The problem with "All lives matter" is that it dismisses the fact that there is racial discrimination alive and well in our law enforcement system.

This is an argument against ideological purists kneecapping ONE movement trying to make change in order to maintain their purity. The effectiveness of that change is very much up for debate, but the sacrifice people who choose to vote are making is negligible compared to the potential impact their vote CAN make (see Zhoran Mamdani or Donald Trump for the extremes of that change).

The goal of this argument is not to discount the concerns of the people who refuse to vote, but to advocate for them to use their privilege, in spite of their disagreements, to increase the likelihood that this ONE method will have the CHANCE to try to affect positive (or at least less negative) change.