this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
1377 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

17907 readers
14 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Source please if you have one, I’d love to read about what those costs are if they’re real

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://www.nyc.gov/mayors-office/news/2026/09/mamdani-administration-advances-plan-to-build-nearly-4-000-new-h

The costs are real of course, but seemingly handled by a private company that was willing to pay for the project.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which means the cost to the city was - everyone all together now:

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that the original commenter accurately noted that there are costs, but this particular little screenshot does nothing to explain the nuance.

So you have to acknowledge the costs and how they were actually handled, instead of just 'I need sources for the very obvious reality that renovating a building isn't "free".

"No cost to the city" is accurate, but it's completely reasonable to fixate on how 'no cost' doesn't make sense and not think hard enough on the 'to the city' part of it and ask for some explanation/discussion of that nuance.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

"No cost to the city" is accurate

Thank you

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sinks and showers and walls do not install themselves? What kind of a source are you looking for here?

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Just because there is A cost, doesn’t mean it cost the city anything. The original comment sounds like an assumption, and I’d like to validate it