this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12445 readers
605 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Parliament is back in session. We must pressure the senate to put an end to this surveillance bill madness.

https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/45-1/C-22

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did a corporate liberal write this. Doing nothing plays into their hands.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No, a realist wrote it. You can do things like write letters and petitions, attend protests, etc., and I'm not even saying people shouldn't or that those things were bad. People should exercise what little rights we do have before they're taken away, too. But I am saying that, ultimately, it cannot stop anything, which is the question being asked. The system is functioning exactly as intended: power and authority concentrated by and to the few.

Trudeau, whom I would still choose over Poillievre 10/10 times, showed us that exactly. He won by talking election reform, then dumped it in the trash as soon as possible without even having any actual exploratory consultations, surveys, etc. Power cannot and will not be given back to the people by polite elections twice a decade. Because the problem is that I still would vote for Trudeau or Carney 10/10 times instead of Poillievre, because that's the best our system gives us. (Let's just be honest and say there aren't viable alternate contenders even if the system technically allows for it.)

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

The issue is that Justin Trudeau and his elite liberals did not face enough protests for abandoning proportional representation. Pierre Poilievre conservatives were even more opposed to proportional representation.