this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
12 points (87.5% liked)

Gardening

6914 readers
73 users here now

Your Ultimate Gardening Guide.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Genuine question. When I look up options for heating greenhouses its either propane, kerosene or electricity. So if you dont want to use fossil energy for any reason, why not use peltier elements which would boil down to resistive heating and moving heat from the outside to the inside?

Is it because they dont last in the weather? Or because they require a DC source? (couldnt you simply move the PSU inside the greenhouse and use any conversion losses as additional heating?) Or maybe its because you would have to possibly cut a hole in your greenhouse walls so that the peltiers cold side is actually on the outside?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is not correct.

Heat pumps are capable of being more than "100% efficient" because they are tapping into an external heat source, the electricity that is being used to operate the device is not the entire sum of the energy available to the device.

Once you step out to the greater picture of the electricity + the available environmental energy, then it returns to equilibrium, but when you're only calculating wattage and the electricity required to operate it, then you can get up to four times the amount of heat output per watt of electricity used with a properly designed system compared to a resistive element.