this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
61 points (88.6% liked)

Political Memes

12533 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Credit for screenshots: 'asdfmovie' series by TomSka

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i made a post a while back about how a 'anti-tankie' comm in particular had a lot of talk about wanting to get rid of 'degenerate roaches' without any real moderation going on.

i find that kind of talk a lot more offputting than tankies.

i've run into a lot of people on here saying some gross ass shit and getting away with it because as long as they're targetting 'tankies' anything goes.

usually when someone's deploying the line 'tankie bar' it's because they frequent meanwhileongrad, it is hosted on the same server as the person i was replying to, they even have a post history there.

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So let's do the ultimate test: In your oppinion: is there any scenario where deploying the military (tanks) against civilians is a legitimate course of action?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

obviously not, i am not a fan of state violence broadly.

now please let me reverse it: is there any scenario where using 'sanctions' or other economic warfare against a civilian population is a legitimate course of action?

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay, not a tankie then.

In credit of the other poster though, most people on ml do defend the udssr doing that, so calling ml a tankie bar is not that far fetched.

And of course: no there is no way starving people is a legitimate course of action, ofc I condemn the Cuba blockade, friends of mine even went there this summer to help. If you think I even remotely defend US politcs you heavily misunderstood my words.

(I consider myself a Marxist if this wasn't clear)

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

that's good to hear. i actually appreciate these spaces because i would rather know what the heterodox opinions are, the us media ecosystem is extremely anticommunist, pro-murica, and shallow. i organize with anarchists in my day to day, i consider myself an anarchist. i also have many comrades that i've shared struggle with over the years who are marxists, and that always made the everpresent online animosity feel weird to me.