this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
949 points (94.6% liked)

Political Memes

12546 readers
3549 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Looks like tankies and bots are working overtime.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Nice Ad hominem, how about you actually engage with the argument instead of retreating to the liberal psychosis of the "Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Robot" conspiracy?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nice ad hominem. How about saying that to those in Uyghur concentration camps.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

??? Your comment is an actual ad hominem, do you not know what the words you use mean? An ad hominem is not just "when someone insults you" it is when someone dismisses the argument presented based on the perceived value of the character of the person making the argument - As you did when you failed to engage with the actual argument given and instead talked about some psychotic "bots and tankies". You have to actually present an argument in order to for me to hit you with an ad hominem, which you've failed to do, which is what I pointed out.

Now you then also go on and move the goalposts. You and I have not discussed whatever it is you're trying to discuss, in fact we're discussing your failure to engage with someone who did discuss that with you. So why would I want to? You've so far shown you're completely incapable.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

'Awww look at me, I'm so full of decorum! Why won't you debate with me: a not bad faith actor!"

Why am I seeing this idiotic tactic lately from obvious wumaos? It's obviously not a coincidence. How about telling Xi not to inflict ad hominem to Uyghurs.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah man, I'm all decorum, that's why I'm pointing out what a dipshit you are. I'm not even trying to debate you, you idiot. I'm trying to get you to stop being the laziest variant of a redditor possible.

Why am I seeing this idiotic tactic lately from obvious wumaos?

Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Filthy Foreigner

How about telling Xi not to inflict ad hominem to Uyghurs.

I don't know him, but if I did I would if he were doing that, but he isn't, so I wouldn't, if I knew him. How about reading the actual report? How about looking into anything beyond what you pick up through cultural osmosis in your racist echochamber?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Oh right, of course you you don't know Xi. You are a small fish getting small crumbs.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

(Dude this thread is 3 days old)

[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago

And people are still commenting

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What an erudite rebuttal. You sure disproved what I said with the absolutely no information you provided.

I assume the fact that you didn't actually address either point is due to the fact that you know what instead dnwas correct and you're salty your cable news talking heads haven't given you the right talking points to get around that?