this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
627 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

22626 readers
1155 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Why would you even get into bestiality?” he asked. “We’re not into bestiality,” said Patel.

In a further exchange, Patel explained to Senator John Kennedy, the Louisiana Republican, that previously, regulations had barred anyone who engaged in bestiality “on either side of it.”

“Either side of what, the bestiality?” asked Kennedy. “So you disqualified the animal?”

“We have great canines, but we’re not going to disqualify them,” said Patel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Hr is trying to say people who fucked animals during hazing rituals are victims.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like the framing of whether they are victims or not is kinda irrelevant. I just don’t want people who won’t say no to fucking animals just to get into a frat to have any kind of authority.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know what, I particularly don't want people who are willing to admit to fucking an animal during a job interview to work.

Not just at the FBI, kinda anywhere.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

But if they're not busy working they might be busy fucking animals.

Like how I don't mind when trump plays a shit load of ~~good~~ golf.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Personally I could put them to work. My definition of work is quite liberal and can definitely fall under a human rights violation at its most sadistic.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Golf right? Bad golf at that. Bummer of a typo.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 weeks ago

My swipe keyboard failed me yet again.

I swear my pixel 9 has a bad digitizer.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, people who get hazed are victims of abuse. You can be both an abuser and a victim.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I was sitting here wondering why there would be such a wide spread issue such that they would move to change the rules instead of just covering up some isolated incident.

I didn't think of hazing as a possibility, but that totally tracks and just reiterates how totally screwed up their candidate pool is...

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They could have just added the word "willingly" to the rule. They didn't, because they're trying to hire some fucked up people for the next stage of their reich.