this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
231 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87877 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 63 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Does that mean Musk's businesses have access to everything people do on the systems that use their data centers?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 73 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn't put a hard "no" on that possibility.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nobody can verify that those "contracts" are actually being honored. We are all assuming the fascists will self police themselves out of good will.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 53 minutes ago

Not true. I've been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

[–] skvlp@feddit.nl 32 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you’re right, but Elon don’t strike me as the guy whose most compliant to SLA, law, or anything else that might be an inconvenience to him.

[–] esc@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

He can't micromanage everything and regular management will try to comply.

[–] shartgargle@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 minute ago

I highly doubt that he really knows that much, either.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 1 hour ago

Executives are the biggest cheaters out there. They will only comply if it will hurt them if they don't, and it's won't here, as long as the protection money is produced they don't have to worry.

[–] skvlp@feddit.nl 3 points 2 hours ago

I agree with that. But I think "the right" data scientists can infer too much from all those AI queries, and I think Elon can abuse that for his own gain.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Impossible to know.

There are systems for doing things cryptographically secure, but I don’t know much about that.

Homomorphic encryption? Much slower than "trust me, bro".

[–] 314xel@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Cryptography? Security? FROM A GENAI COMPANY?!

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Well yeah, for themselves