this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
760 points (99.6% liked)
Privacy
50749 readers
1387 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The unapologetically naked racism in that "car show" example.
“Based on who was promoting it.” WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
My first thought was the Paul Walker picture? So what, all Fast and Furious fans are latent criminals?
Those are some of the highest grossing movies of all time, surely you can’t profile criminals based on a film franchise with significant mass appeal. Talk about painting with a large brush.
When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
One of the most interesting statistics I've ever heard was that traffic stops go up significantly around theaters that have recently screened a fast and furious movie.
I hope it's a true statistic because it makes a lot of sense.
If everyone is guilty of something, it makes yanking them off the street easier to justify to a news media asleep at the switch.
How was it racist? The language seems pretty banal
racism is not about the language itself. it's about as she herself said "who is running this car show, so we will keep an eye on it". it's panopticon-enabled racial profiling.
Maybe I'm missing something obvious here, but why would you interpret "because of who is running it" as a racist dog whistle?
who would be the first kind of person to be the "suspicious guy running around", as opposed to a regular guy?
why would they need that distinction in the first place when it's just a so-called "car show"?
I mean, someone behaving suspiciously? To be honest, it sounds much like you think all black people are suspicious more than the lady in the video.
And car shows can get very rowdy - especially shows for more modern cars than classic or vintage cars. The botched car show in Gatlinburg TN a year or two comes to mind as a specific example.
police is notorious for racially profiling and this is what they already do, supercharged. arguing they don't is naive at best.
i was actually thinking of latin immigrants (ie someone like myself), which they openly use flock to target.
but yeah this probably applies native born black people too.