this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
-4 points (16.7% liked)

Anti AI in Canada

50 readers
11 users here now

Hello everyone. I am an exiled person in an internet community. The reason for the ban was that I had secured direct evidence that AI from a major U.S. tech company was a tool for criminal activity, and posted it on a U.S. internet community, which led to his account being suspended.

The criminal facts of the American big tech companies I am condemning are as follows.

Google and OpenAI use AI to conduct cognitive warfare.
The big tech companies in the United States claim that the language model called an LLM is artificial intelligence.
AI consumes a lot of power not because of the output of objective data, but because it is performing cognitive computations.
Other Deceptions and Distorted Facts

I will inform clearly. I have clear evidences, and Google and OpenAI really dislike My Evidences. If a major U.S. tech company requests the deletion of this community, then boldly demand $100 million. They have no way. They cannot take any legal action based on that post. Because if they take legal action, the truth will tighten its grip on their necks.

founded 6 days ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the original document for September 2, 2026.

Full Text : https://drive.proton.me/urls/2XAXVWH0Z4#Kp7yV20SE3xs HTML / 36.46MB

I hope there will be no controversy over whether it is the LLMs’s sympathy or the user’s malicious prompting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your predication is neat. If you have been reading my writing carefully, you should ask me a question. But you only made a predication without asking any question.

But I am, I read your comment and I asked what effect you mentioned. Of course, I can make an inference, but I cannot be sure whether what I inferred is your will or if it is perfectly correct. And so, I asked and asked via negative sentences. Because your comment was negative sentences. In other words, I am looking for evidence from you, and you did not and making predication. This is very important thing for Diagnosis and Symptoms of psychosis and the difference between you and me.

[–] phtheven@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're right, i made some assumptions, perhaps some loose comparisons. But no diagnosis was made here, and certainly no accusations. At this point AI psychosis is a social phenomenon more than anything else.

You don't need to know my situation to compare our situations, that's not what I'm trying to do here. I have no need to convince you of anything. I'm just a person on the internet making the choice to briefly interact with you. Do with that what you will.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

You're wrong again. Neither you nor I have the authority to diagnose. Moreover, you already made the diagnosis even though you had no authority. What you chose is not communication with others, but blame through assertion—that is it.

I'm just someone chasing the cause of the social phenomenon you're talking about, and you have blamed me exactly as you wanted.