this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
81 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31034 readers
1866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON — Vying to become House speaker in a few months, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries outlined four items on the agenda that he said would enjoy “uniform Democratic support” and advance the party’s goal of “making life more affordable.”

The first two were about healthcare, and all four set a direct contrast with President Donald Trump.

“We have to reverse the Medicaid cuts. We should extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits,” Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Monday in response to a question from NBC News. “We should restore congressional authority as it relates to tariffs, because the Trump tariffs are making life more expensive for the American people. And we should end, decisively, if it’s still going on, Donald Trump’s reckless and costly war of choice in the Middle East.”


While there’s agreement on restoring the Medicaid and ACA funds that were undone by Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, there are divisions inside the Democratic Party about what its own healthcare agenda should be.

Ocasio-Cortez is part of a large and influential faction on the left that wants to pursue a “Medicare for All” system that would diminish — if not abolish — private insurance and give the government power to negotiate prices of medication and services downward. Many moderate Democrats have rejected that idea in favor of less disruptive changes, although the center-left hasn’t coalesced around a preferred vision. One outside center-left group floated “free primary care for all” as a way to break the stalemate between supporters of a single-payer Medicare for All system and of focusing on building on the current ACA.

So, the party establishment is behind proping up their donors? The entire developed world has universal health-insurance. Even Mexico has it. But not the people in the US? That is one thing that would drastically improve the lives of the American people. Universal Health Coverage Could Save $1 Trillion and 114,000 Lives Every Year.

Our government hates us. This is the s#it that lead up to DJT in the first place. Going back to half measures like this is a recipe for:

Especially since the AI job losses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jeffries is such garbage, I wish someone would primary his ass already.

Adopting right wing framing on M4A is so typical of an empty suit like him. Yes, abolish private insurance, that’s the idea dipshit - and replace it with the objectively better Medicare insurance to make doctor’s lives easier and help patients get desperately needed care.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It blows my mind how many people are necessary in a modern family-practice office.

It also blows my mind that my insurance company:

  • won't let my vascular doc perform tests on veins and arteries on the same day. Had to reschedule for two separate appointments
  • thinks I don't need physical therapy anymore, despite monthly flare-ups that leave me barely able to stand for more than a few minutes, and despite the words of my DPT and my Ortho.
  • recognizes that I have (at least) 3 qualifying criteria for glp-1 coverage, but since all of them are borderline, I'm not sick enough yet and must pay cash (or at least a "heavily discounted" price that's still several times more the generic prices abroad).

Would really like to understand how oral semalglutode contains something like 70x the active ingredient of subQ semalglutode, yet the oral is cheaper.

Don't even get me started on the bullshit of HSA or especially FSA reimbursements.

[–] bloviate@lemmus.org 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Injectables cost way more than oral drugs because of sterility requirements. You literally almost have to build a new building and have the FDA watch it.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There is a pill now

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Then why is online compounded semalglutide so much cheaper?

And how are the overseas generic manufacturers able to sell so cheaply?

They literally have a cure for the biggest chronic condition, responsible for a huge array of comorbidities, brought on entirely by their friends in the food industry selling addictive, nutritionally void food cheaper and more shippable than anything actually good for you...and they lock it up right behind steep profits.

Those cheap void foods that are making us all fat are largely cheap due to farm subsidies, too, so we're paying for that too.

It's bullshit and anti-human. Not as vulgar as when they do it to insulin, but still evil.

Remember that documentary...Fat, Sick, and Nearly Dead? With that guy who sold juicers? Yeah he was a fucking kook. But I definitely think he's right about pharma and food working in lockstep to keep us fat and sick.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Would really like to understand how oral semalglutode contains something like 70x the active ingredient of subQ semalglutode, yet the oral is cheaper.

Not to defend the drug price bullshit in any way, everything is more expensive than it should be across the board... but if those price differences are a pill versus a prefilled autoinjector, that's a big difference in material and manufacturing cost per dose.