this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
311 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

87708 readers
4418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world -5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Uhh, you’re skipping a few steps

Steps that either would not work between architectures or that Rosetta would handle (thereby answering your own question)

And I’m not here to teach a computer science class

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Steps that either would not work between architectures or that Rosetta would handle (thereby answering your own question)

What? They would compile the code that they control for the M-series architectures. The target architecture is M-series ARM chips running on MacOS.

Rosetta is for translating x86 to ARM. Which wouldn't be necessary because there are no x86 binaries involved at all.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Oh, I guess you’re right about that

My mistake

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

No, @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world is right.

What does Rosetta have anything to do with what OpenAI needs? Machine learning on Macs is done in MLX or something else with Metal, running OSX. Most agenic frameworks or other ML-related infrastructure are just Python, or open code that can compile on OSX/Macs just fine. In fact, OSX is often the first target platform.

This even includes inter-node frameworks for clustering Macs together.

No one doing "AI" on Macs is using Rosetta. There's no point, and its a bad idea. They're doing everything in OSX, which works fine, and I can't imagine what OpenAI would be doing with them that wouldn't work in OSX.

But maybe I'm missing what you're implying here. And I'm sorry to come off as thorny, but condescending comments like "I’m not here to teach a computer science class" rub me the wrong way.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

If you don’t know, then you are really not in a position to say that I’m wrong LMAO

Have fun with your little “my ignorance is proof that I’m right!” concept, lol

Oh, and the fact that you even brought “AI” into the conversation is hilarious

The two of you should get together and do a stand-up routine called “I and O my God I have no idea what I’m talking about”

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You didn't answer my question.

What does rosetta have to do with any of this?