this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
265 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

67365 readers
303 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] distal@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This guy is complete trash. Does excessive coding rip holes into people's brains?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, because until the dot-com era when "tech bros" first became a thing, a lot of the computing pioneers were leftist/hippie counterculture types. Think MIT AI Lab (RMS), The Homebrew Computer Club (Woz, Captain Crunch), Germany's Chaos Computer Club, etc.

Further reading:

https://bigthink.com/the-present/1960s-counterculture-created-silicon-valley/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_the_Dormouse_Said

[–] TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Explain the likes of Curtis Yarvin then. There's definitely some techno fascists that go back further than dot-com

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He said "a lot", he didn't say "all"

[–] TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I explained myself badly and I think that comment reads as more argumentative than I intended.

I meant to say that the countercultural world of the early internet created a lot of the deeply problematic culture of the current moment as well as having a bunch of right-on goodness. The seeds of the bad shit were also there in amongst everything that was good.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Can't argue with that

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not Yarvin though, he's too young for that. He is exactly a product of (what came after) the dot-com era. That's when people's brains started to melt.

[–] TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

You're entirely right. For some reason I thought he'd been around a lot longer

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 8 points 2 days ago

There seems to be a notable amount of FOSS coders of the old guard (90s til 00s) that are like that.

I long frequented a place called linuxquestions.org. You wouldn't believe how right-wing to libertarian most of the people there were. Still are I guess.

Some gained status (Ruby on Rails was a big thing 1 or 2 decades back) and started spouting things because they knew people were listening.

Some people in such communities recognize that there's something off here, and they have this excuse ready: all coders/nerds are basically on the spectrum (they don't phrase it like this though) and don't know how to phrase things politely, they just blurt it out.

As if that makes things better when you think like that guy.