this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5136 readers
252 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Australian government is considering allowing users to opt in or opt out of social media algorithms, and is looking at a recent UK ban on depictions of strangulation and suffocation in pornography.

The social services minister, Tanya Plibersek, said social media was “playing a huge role” in the increase in sexual violence among teenagers and choking, and confirmed the options were being considered as the government develops its second action plan to end family and domestic violence against women and children.

It follows the death of a 16-year-old girl in Sydney after a suspected sexual strangulation act. Guardian Australia reported on Thursday that a source informed about the case said the teenager was believed to have become unconscious as a result of asphyxiation during sexual intercourse, often referred to as “choking”. No arrests have been made...

Labor will also soon begin consultation on a digital duty of care bill that will put the onus on tech companies, including AI companies, to make online spaces safer for all users.

Plibersek said the digital duty of care legislation, as well as a second round of privacy reforms, could also help tackle camera-equipped smartglasses, which she said she had serious concerns about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Yes let's start banning specific acts in porn... That's not a slippery slope at all.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes let’s start banning specific acts in porn… That’s not a slippery slope at all.

I generally agree with you on principle. But I'll play devil's advocate here:

CSAM is prohibited because those consuming CSAM create a demand for those producing it, who in turn abuse children to produce it, thereby creating victims. People add all kinds of moral reasons on top of that to justify interfering with what people get off on, as always. But ultimately, the reason why CSAM is banned is to protect children.

Similarly, I can conceive that strangulation porn is something children want to try, and the ban aims at protecting them from themselves.

Teenagers exploring sexual practices and choking themselves is nothing new: a number of them die every year of asphyxiation, and it's something schools and parents have been fighting for as long as I can remember - and I'm not a young man anymore. This strangulation porn ban thing is something that can conceivably be a response to that phenomenon as well.

However, I will say this: if that's indeed what that is, it'll probably cause a chilling effect on free speech more than it'll help children, as usual.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

yeah its not my bag but we know auto erotic asphyxiation is a thing so people im sure like to give and recieve this kind of thing like a lot of sex things. if anything lack of porn means you got to get your kicks by doing it.

[–] Tenderizer@aussie.zone 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

IIRC I'm pretty sure it's already banned under Australian law. While I dislike the type of person who uses the term "nanny state", it is a reasonably accurate descriptor.