this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
467 points (87.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32983 readers
1090 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world/p/1758477/using-fascist-technology-to-fight-fascism-still-promotes-fascist-technology

Using fascist technology to fight fascism still promotes fascist technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wedge@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I appreciate and applaud the chance to change the post.

Ultimately I’m not interested in partaking in new speak ableism for the sake of a humorous online forum.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retard The word is not hate speech, it’s a legitimate word long associated with a concept rather than personal trait or identity.

We’ve allowed our online spaces to be a bastion of idiotic ideas, giving every bad and unintelligent thought a platform and inherent validation. Effectively creating a post-truth reality.

On principle I won’t enable that. Again appreciate the offer, do what you have to do. There are real-world sociological consequences.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Oh, I see. That definition gives me a new perspective... I always thought of it as ableism.. before online spaces, and even before the word ableism came to my life. As a kid, I always heard that using retarded as an insult was wrong.

I guess I will have to add this to my todo list, right after invention of time travel ;p hehe. Imagine a kid quoting the dictionary to an adult.

In any case, your comment stays and my person has learned something new for moderation, beyond this terminology.. the context is very important. I actually felt like removing the comment would have been wrong. It seemed your words were too harsh but still, they were going for a point, without raw intent to insult or carry any ad hominem fallacy. I see my instinct was right :) hooray!