this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
338 points (96.9% liked)

Atheist Memes

7314 readers
161 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok but we can agree that God could stop the Nazis from committing genocide?

Which he didn't.

Yes yes I know, freedom of mind and all that shit.

But ok let's say a child born with a disability because of the mother was drinking while pregnant. What did the child do that god let it be born with a crippling disability?

For example god could make us humans not being intoxicated by alcohol. He could perform wonders and heal the child. But it is a long time since the last wonder of God....

Pretty much since our understanding of the world grew and we can logically explain even previous wonders which then weren't ones

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if God were to intervene every time a human being chose evil? Can we imagine such a world? There would be no more suffering, sure, but there would be no freedom either. That is worse than a totalitarian regime; even with surveillance cameras and smartphone trackers, we still retain some private space, if only within our own minds. But what if the dictator is God? He is omnipotent and omniscient; He needs no cameras. Is that really an enviable world? It would be worse than a mere lack of freedom: we would desire to act on our own, yet the axe would fall every single time. Where would the line be drawn: only at serious wrongdoing? Even so, we would know we were constantly being watched. Such a God would rule through fear.

God chose another path; a better one, I think. Rather than imposing Himself upon us or crushing us with His omnipotence (even an omnipotence limited by logic), He chose total weakness. He chose to suffer with us. That is the meaning of the Incarnation and the Cross: He did not die so much for us as with us. He does not impose Himself; He offers an invitation. He does not wish to reign through fear, but through love.

God gave us a law of love so that suffering might cease. He gave us a moral sense. He gave us a reason to fight against disease and natural disasters. He gave us the keys to break the cycle of violence. He gave us everything we need, so let's stop hiding behind Him like spoiled children! And in the meantime, he accompanies those who are suffering and welcomes those who are departing.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago

So you are saying God helps the ones that help themselves?

So no God needed in the first place?

Or second place rather.

If you believe God create us and then doesn't interfere anymore.

[–] weps@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

maybe

probably not though

it was written

by men

and you know how men are