this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
106 points (95.7% liked)

Programming

28256 readers
293 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You do live in reality, do you?

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the reality that consists in giving up on all proper solutions out of being "down to earth", effectively solving nothing.

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The proper not possible solution... Sure...

People like you are the reason I gave up on the things getting better. What you people propose has nothing to do with how the world works we live in. It's all based on how the world should work.

Good luck with banning llms, seems realistic.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, I forgot how easy it is to hide datacenters and massive data collection. Really, really hard to enforce, huh.

[–] Derg@programming.dev 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

You can, as of this very moment, download a 16 GB LLM and run it on your local computer. Or any bigger version, if you happen to have a beefy computer. LLMs are software. Good luck banning software. This is the internet.

ALSO, even if you do happen to be able to ban AI training facilities and such in the U.S., and those models become outdated, you can even go download some Chinese models too! They are not going away.

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago

What the fuck are you talking about? 🙄

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right but why would we want to license vibecoded slop?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Irrelevant question. For licensing and copyright questions, quality of code is not important.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

See Microsoft and Google.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why would we want to license ~~vibecoded slop~~ code built with a system that is (in most cases) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all

You answered your own question. I don't know what you try to say, but the article and our discussion is explaining if and why licensing code that is vibe coded is possible or makes sense at all. And you point the problem out that this is problematic and probably not possible in good faith. So its not about what we want, but about if and what is possible.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago

Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to.

Responded to the wrong comment, apologies.